Re: powercycle suite with -k testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> During hammer integration testing, I ran some powercycle suites with "-k
> testing" and found that I could reproduce
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17984 not only on the hammer-backports
> branch, but in hammer and jewel as well. But it only fails with "-k testing"
> (i.e. the "testing" kernel).
>
> Can anyone shed light on this?

Hi Nathan,

Known 4.9 kernel regression [1], should be fixed by [2].  I've just
re-pushed testing branch with the fix, just in case you want to try it
out.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177801
[2] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0ce267ff95a0302cf6fb2a552833abbfb7861a43

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux