No, how to verify it? And do you have any clue what made that assert fail? Thank you
At 2016-11-20 15:28:26, "huang jun" <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>seems like the ceph and ceph-debuginfo package version not match, do
>you verified it?
>
>2016-11-20 15:20 GMT+08:00 xxhdx1985126 <xxhdx1985126@xxxxxxx>:
>> In my test today, the same problem came up even there is no such warning....
>>
>> By the way, the problem of ceph that I want to fix is as such: some of my osd can't finish the recovery+backfilling process due to the failure of the following assert:
>>
>> 2016-11-19 07:00:49.133814 7fc7a77ff700 -1 error_msg osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: In function 'void ReplicatedPG::wait_for_unreadable_object(const hobject_t&, OpRequestRef)' thread 7fc7a77ff700 time 2016-11-19 07:00:48.914231
>> osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: 387: FAILED assert(needs_recovery)
>>
>> ceph version 0.94.5-12-g83f56a1 (83f56a1c84e3dbd95a4c394335a7b1dc926dd1c4)
>> 1: (ReplicatedPG::wait_for_unreadable_object(hobject_t const&, std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x3f5) [0x8b5a65]
>> 2: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>&)+0x5e9) [0x8f0c79]
>> 3: (ReplicatedPG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>&, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x4e3) [0x87fdc3]
>> 4: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x178) [0x66b3f8]
>> 5: (OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*)+0x59e) [0x66f8ee]
>> 6: (ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int)+0x795) [0xa76d85]
>> 7: (ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xa7a610]
>> 8: /lib64/libpthread.so.0() [0x393da07a51]
>> 9: (clone()+0x6d) [0x393d6e893d]
>> NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this.
>>
>> I'm using ceph-0.94.5 which should be the version "Hammer".
>> Do you have any clue about what made this assert fail?
>>
>>
>> At 2016-11-20 09:51:47, "huang jun" <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>that maybe the reason, do you have the same problem if there is no such warning?
>>>
>>>2016-11-19 19:00 GMT+08:00 xxhdx1985126 <xxhdx1985126@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, everyone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to fix a problem in ceph using its core file and gdb.
>>>> gdb successfully loaded debug symbol from ceph-debuginfo:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reading symbols from /usr/bin/ceph-osd...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ceph-osd.debug...done.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, it still can't find the symbol table when I use "bt" to trace the stack:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #0 0x000000393da0f65b in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #1 0x0000000000a51636 in install_standard_sighandlers () at global/signal_handler.cc:121
>>>> No locals.
>>>> #2 0x00007fc7a77f9ed0 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #3 0x00007fc7a77f9e10 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #4 0x00007fc7a77f9b90 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #5 0x00007fc66d3142e0 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #6 0x00007fc7fac64100 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #7 0x0000003900000000 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #8 0x0000000000a51155 in SignalHandler::unregister_handler (this=0x1105440, signum=<value optimized out>, handler=<value optimized out>) at global/signal_handler.cc:317
>>>> No locals.
>>>> #9 0x000000393eabcc33 in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>> #10 0x000000393eabcd2e in ?? ()
>>>> No symbol table info available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why is this happening?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: when gdb started running, it prompted the following warning:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BFD: Warning: /home/xuxuehan/online_problems.2016-11-19.7-01/core-ceph-osd-6-32337-32337-19906-1479510049 is truncated: expected core file size >= 8372899840, found: 7439335424
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could this be the cause of gdb not finding the symbol table?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Thank you!
>>>HuangJun
>
>
>
>--
>Thank you!
>HuangJun
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
