On 01/11/2016 10:17, Orit Wasserman wrote: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 is merged in master. > Loic, is it still possible to backport it to 10.2.4? Yes. > > Thanks, > Orit > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub > <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been >> accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see >> it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is >> supposed to look into that. >> >> Yehuda >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Robin, >>> >>> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> Hi Yehuda, >>>>> >>>>> The next jewel release as found at >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite >>>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel >>>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 >>>> >>>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. >>>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
