Re: rgw backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 25/10/2016 04:22, Matt Benjamin wrote:
> Hi Loic,
> 
> Sorry about the late response.  Looks like you resolved the first two.  Drilling into 3, does the lack of conditional -lldap obstruct automake build?  Apparently not?

It looks like it's not a blocker indeed :-)

Cheers

> Regards,
> 
> Matt
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Matt Benjamin" <mbenjamin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:37:17 AM
>> Subject: rgw backports
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> The following jewel backports
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17322
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17319
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17313
>>
>> conflict when trying to cherry-pick them and I would appreciate your advice
>> on how to handle them. Should they be resolved or do you think the best
>> action is to try to backport the commits that could prevent the conflict ?
>> If you don't have an opinion it's also fine, I'll figure it out ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux