Re: jewel: bad rados_buffer_free from librados python bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2016 06:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
H Sage,

It looks like http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15454 surfaced in jewel (failed twice in a row at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-19). It did not occur before, therefore I suspect it's a side effect of some of the commits in the jewel backports integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16 ), but I don't see which commit in that branch could have caused that kind of misbehavior.

Since you marked http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15454 as Resolved with no commits attached, I suppose it means it went away for some reason. Could you please confirm ?

Hmm, unfortunately I don't remember working on this one.  My guess is it
came up during a bug scrub discussion and that's when it got closed.
Hopefully Kefu or Josh remember?

I don't think I've seen that particular bug before, so hopefully Kefu
remembers it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux