There is one more backport required [1] once it is merged into the master branch (hopefully this week) to fix an assertion failure that would otherwise be introduced by 10.2.4. Thanks, Jason [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11520 On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > Unless I missed something, all backports that matter are now in the last round of testing[1]. If we're lucky all backports in the testing branch (jewel-backports) will be merged. Even if it's not the case I'll make sure at least all the urgent ones[2] are. > > If the test infrastructure permits, I should be able to propose you to cut 10.2.4 early next week. > > Cheers > > [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16 > [2] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 > > On 10/10/2016 12:59, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Abhishek, >> >> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-) >> >> Cheers >> >> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318 >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
