Re: mempool update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/10/2016 02:05 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Allen, everyone,

<snip>


    "bluestore_meta_onode": {
        "total_bytes": 174760,
        "total_items": 257,
        "by_type": [
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::Onode",
                "bytes": 174760,
                "items": 257
            }
        ]
    },
    "bluestore_meta_other": {
        "total_bytes": 7969096,
        "total_items": 76899,
        "by_type": [
            {
                "type": "std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<unsigned long const, bluestore_extent_ref_m
ap_t::record_t> >",
                "bytes": 1146048,
                "items": 23876
            },
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::ExtentMap::Shard",
                "bytes": 111384,
                "items": 1989
            },
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::SharedBlob",
                "bytes": 2494848,
                "items": 12994
            },
            {
                "type": "std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<int const, boost::intrusive_ptr<BlueStore::
Blob> > >",
                "bytes": 55056,
                "items": 1147
            },
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::Blob",
                "bytes": 3014608,
                "items": 12994
            },
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::Extent",
                "bytes": 1147152,
                "items": 23899
            },
            {
                "type": "std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<unsigned long const, std::unique_ptr<BlueSt
ore::Buffer, std::default_delete<BlueStore::Buffer> > > >",
                "bytes": 0,
                "items": 0
            },
            {
                "type": "BlueStore::Buffer",
                "bytes": 0,
                "items": 0
            }
        ]
    }


I ran some tests yesterday, sadly without 11394 until we've got a working version we can apply to wip-mempool. I dumped the stats (this was with about 14GB of RSS per OSD!) and compared them against Sage's numbers:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2gTBZrkrnpZdlNjNWkzbU4xMk0/view?usp=sharing

Looks like in my run some of the types are a bit smaller. Not sure if that's due to fixes being applied to wip-mempool after sage's run. The total amount of memory used by the cache is way smaller than the RSS of the OSD, but that's probably to be expected right now.

Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux