Re: [sepia] teuthology support for the new build system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Zack Cerza <zack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> You've probably heard that we've been working on replacing the
>> gitbuilders with a new build system. I recently did some work [0] in
>> teuthology to support that new system, and that work got merged
>> yesterday. Here's an overview of its current state:
>>
>> The way it works is that it talks to Shaman [1] to locate the package
>> repository to use. It is not enabled by default as it isn't yet able
>> to cover all gitbuilder use cases. It can be enabled by setting
>> "use_shaman: true" in either your teuthology.yaml or your job's yaml.
>> It can be set for an entire suite-run by doing something like:
>>
>> $ echo "use_shaman: true" > ./shaman.yaml
>> $ teuthology-suite -v -c jewel -s upgrade/jewel-x -m vps -k distro
>> $PWD/shaman.yaml --dry-run
>>
>> Of course, later on when we can fully replace gitbuilders this
>> behavior will be the default. At some point after that we'll be
>> decommissioning the gitbuilders.
>>
>> Please note that using it in the following scenarios will *not* do
>> what you want:
>>
>> * Any job that requires one of our testing kernels, as the new system
>> isn't building our kernels yet
>> * Any job that uses the install task for samba, for the same reason
>> * Any job that uses ceph-deploy, as ceph-deploy isn't using the new system yet
>
> I think Alfredo mentioned this in his thread, but we also don't seem
> to be building the "notcmalloc" flavors, so don't try and run any
> valgrind tests against it.
> Are there other flavors we know are missing?
>
> An FS run (http://pulpito.ceph.com/gregf-2016-10-05_20:40:25-fs-master---basic-mira/)
> had quite a few other failures, but just scanning the errors I don't
> think any of the others are because of the build system.

I believe the java failures there are probably because they're not
getting built in the new system yet?  I think there was a ticket but I
don't have it to hand.

John

> -Greg
>
>>
>> Please try to give this new system some exercise. It's been tested
>> well but of course we can't necessarily anticipate everything.
>> Teuthology bugs, as always, should go here [2] and bugs related to the
>> new build system should go here [3].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux