On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13-9-2016 21:52, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> Is osd.0 actually running? If so it *should* have a socket, unless
>> you've disabled them somehow. Check the logs and see if there are
>> failures when it gets set up, I guess?
>>
>> Anyway, something has indeed gone terribly wrong here. I know at one
>> point you had some messenger patches you were using to try and get
>> stuff going on BSD; if you still have some there I think you need to
>> consider them suspect. Otherwise, uh...the network stack is behaving
>> very differently than Linux's?
>
> So what is the expected result of an osd down/up?
>
> Before it is connected to ports like:
> 127.0.0.1:{6800,,6801,6802}/{nonce=pid-like}
> after the osd has gone down/up the sockets work be:
> 127.0.0.1:{6800,,6801,6802}/{(nonce=pid-like)+1000000}
>
> or are the ports also incremented?
IIRC, it should usually be the same ports and different nonce. But the
port is *allowed* to change; that happens sometimes if there was an
unclean shutdown and the port is still considered in-use by the OS for
instance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
