Hi, inline ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Radoslaw Zarzynski" <rzarzynski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Casey Bodley" <cbodley@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "The Sacred Order of the Squid Cybernetic" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 1:19:11 PM > Subject: Re: rgw: feedback on auth engine selection > > > At the moment RGWHandler is dynamically allocated on each > request. Do we plan to remove only the allocations or go even > further and make handlers entirely state-less? That's been on my list of things to eventually do, for a while--in the librgw front-end, it already is. > > > - req_state: contains too many unrelated fields, some of which are > > transformed in confusing ways over the lifetime of the request. needs to be > > broken up into smaller, better encapsulated sub-objects > > I'm 100% behind that. Me too. Eventually, I'd like avoid needing separate allocations for any subobjects. This was one of the main places I hoped we copuld use the polymorphic union idea that you called "static pointer." :) > > > - concurrency: move away from a synchronous process_request() to build on > > asio frontend work > > Sound really interesting. > > > Let me propose another requirement: > - critical components should facilitate unit testing. In the future > they should be covered by reasonable set of unit tests. sure > > What do you think? > > Regards, > Radek > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
