On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, John Spray wrote: >> Given our current push toward bluestore as the long term plan, I'm >> wondering if anyone would object to me switching off the use of btrfs >> in the CephFS test suites? > > Sounds good to me! OK, just testing this now https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1160 John > sage > >> I think the motivation for this historically was to maximise coverage >> of the FileStore pieces that XFS doesn't exercise, but that probably >> matters less these days, and the (much larger) rados suite covers >> btrfs. >> >> My motivation is to get rid of the intermittent assert(0 == >> "unexpected error") OSD crashes that crop up in our testing every once >> in a while and are attributed to btrfs. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> John >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
