Re: 0.94.8 QE validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15895#note-33
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing:
>
> rados (subset 1/20)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> hadoop
> samba
> rest
> ceph-deploy
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/hammer
> powercycle
>
> Deprecated suites (Sage pls reconfirm)
>
> upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer)
> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis)
> upgrade/firefly-hammer-x (infernalis)
>
> Known issues (need approval):
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17075 was caught be several runs, see
> email from Nathan with details "What to do with python-ceph-compat?"
>
> krbd -  http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17083 (Jason pls review/approve)
> knsf - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17074 (Gregory, Sage pls review/approve)

I don't think we ever had SELinux validated on the FS tests for
hammer? I wouldn't worry about it.
-Greg

> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17075 (Sage
> pls review/approve)
>
> Thx
> YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux