Re: Odd WAL traffic for BlueStore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Somnath,

Yeah, looks like that's indeed non-BlueStore traffic. I made some log analysis and haven't seen any WAL activity at BlueStore level.

And thanks for your comment on rocksdb tuning.

Kind regards,

Igor


On 22.08.2016 18:05, Somnath Roy wrote:
Igor,
I am always seeing this WAL traffic in my 4k tests. Initially, I thought there are some faulty logic on Bluestore side and not honoring min_alloc_size , but, further debugging it seems the traffic is generated from BlueFS/Rocksdb.
Regarding rocksdb tuning, if you are not running the tests long enough (may be >20 min) you wouldn't be seeing any difference with default.

Thanks & Regards
Somnath

-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Igor Fedotov
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 6:47 AM
To: ceph-devel
Subject: Odd WAL traffic for BlueStore

Hi All,

While testing BlueStore as a standalone storage via FIO plugin I'm observing huge traffic to a WAL device.

Bluestore is configured to use 2 450 Gb Intel's SSD: INTEL SSDSC2BX480G4L

The first SSD is split into 2 partitions (200 & 250 Gb) for Block DB and Block WAL.

The second is split similarly and first 200Gb partition allocated for Raw Block data.

RocksDB settings are set as Somnath suggested in his 'RocksDB tuning' .
No much difference comparing to default settings though...

As a result when doing 4k sequential write (8Gb total) to a fresh storage I'm observing (using nmon and other disk mon tools) significant write traffic to WAL device. And it grows eventually from ~10Mbs to ~170Mbs. Raw Block device traffic is pretty stable at ~30 Mbs.

Additionally I inserted an output for BlueFS perf counters on umount(l_bluefs_bytes_written_wal & l_bluefs_bytes_written_sst).

The resulting values are very frustrating: ~28Gb and 4Gb for l_bluefs_bytes_written_wal & l_bluefs_bytes_written_sst respectively.


Doing 64K changes the picture dramatically:

WAL traffic is stable at 10-12 Mbs and RAW Block one is at ~400Mbs
BlueFS counters are ~140Mb and 1K respectively.

Surely write completes much faster in the second case.

No WAL is reported in logs at BlueStore level for both cases.


High BlueFS WAL traffic is observed when running subsequent random 4K RW
over the store propagated this way too.

I'm wondering why WAL device is involved in the process at all ( writes
happen in min_alloc_size blocks) operate and why the traffic and written
data volume is so high?

Don't we have some fault affecting 4K performance here?


Here are my settings and FIO job specification:

###########################

[global]
          debug bluestore = 0/0
          debug bluefs = 1/0
          debug bdev = 0/0
          debug rocksdb = 0/0

          # spread objects over 8 collections
          osd pool default pg num = 32
          log to stderr = false

[osd]
          osd objectstore = bluestore
          bluestore_block_create = true
          bluestore_block_db_create = true
          bluestore_block_wal_create = true
          bluestore_min_alloc_size = 4096
          #bluestore_max_alloc_size = #or 4096
          bluestore_fsck_on_mount = false

          bluestore_block_path=/dev/sdi1
          bluestore_block_db_path=/dev/sde1
          bluestore_block_wal_path=/dev/sde2

          enable experimental unrecoverable data corrupting features =
bluestore rocksdb memdb

          bluestore_rocksdb_options =
"max_write_buffer_number=16,min_write_buffer_number_to_merge=2,recycle_log_file_num=16,compaction_threads=32,flusher_threads=8,max_background_compactions=32,max_background_flushes=8,max_bytes_for_level_base=5368709120,write_buffer_size=83886080,level0_file_num_compaction_trigger=4,level0_slowdown_writes_trigger=400,level0_stop_writes_trigger=800"

          rocksdb_cache_size = 4294967296
          bluestore_csum = false
          bluestore_csum_type = none
          bluestore_bluefs_buffered_io = false
          bluestore_max_ops = 30000
          bluestore_max_bytes = 629145600
          bluestore_buffer_cache_size = 104857600
          bluestore_block_wal_size = 0

          # use directory= option from fio job file
          osd data = ${fio_dir}

          # log inside fio_dir
          log file = ${fio_dir}/log
####################################

#FIO jobs
#################
# Runs a 4k random write test against the ceph BlueStore.
[global]
ioengine=/usr/local/lib/libfio_ceph_objectstore.so # must be found in
your LD_LIBRARY_PATH

conf=ceph-bluestore-somnath.conf # must point to a valid ceph
configuration file
directory=./fio-bluestore # directory for osd_data

rw=write
iodepth=16
size=256m

[bluestore]
nr_files=63
bs=4k        # or 64k
numjobs=32
#############


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux