Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 19/08/2016 13:49, Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd love to see RadosGW v10.2.3 passing RefStack:
> 
> * jewel: rgw: Swift's object versioning doesn't support
>   restoring a previous version on DELETE
>   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16393
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10710

It is scheduled to be tested

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27
http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-17_11:24:55-rgw-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/

as part of the current integration branch

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-23

If we're lucky (i.e. no infrastructure troubles and no rgw pull request disrupt the test in bizarre ways) it will be ready to merge early next week.

Cheers

> 
> Regards,
> Radek
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux