Re: rbd-mirror related jewel backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, that's fine with me.  The only ones left on your original list are
(in order):

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16902 (master 10484) (Tue, 2 Aug 2016
20:14:54 +0300)
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 (master 10574) (Sun, 7 Aug 2016
13:33:45 +0300)
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16978 (master 10613) (Tue, 9 Aug 2016
16:18:49 +0300)

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can try to do that, it is simple enough. Because I'm not very familiar with the code base, it is entirely possible that I end up cherry-picking a lot more than what is reasonable when doing that. It is sometime non trivial to figure out when to stop. Who knows: I may end up cherry-picking *everything* from master :-) I'll call for help if it drifts too much.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 11/08/2016 15:22, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>> No worries.
>>
>> My usual routine just involves pulling up master and jewel branch
>> merge logs for all RBD-related subdirectories in two terminals (for PR
>> merge timeline reference), pulling up the original PR to backport, and
>> then just cherry-pick until a conflict is hit. When that happens, I
>> locate which previous PR made the conflicting change and cherry-pick
>> it into the same backport branch.
>>
>> With this technique, you'll end up with PRs with the same
>> cherry-picked commits.  You'll be able to cleanly merge them into a
>> testing branch, but when it comes time to merge into the jewel branch
>> you'll need to rebase some PRs to automatically strip out the
>> duplicate cherry-picks.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2016 22:14, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>>> Loic,
>>>>
>>>> If you want, I can create the backport PRs for those tickets.
>>>
>>> That would be great. Alternatively, if that's less time consuming for you, just suggest a backport order and I'll figure it out.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mykola,
>>>>>
>>>>> There are seven rbd-mirror related backports which do not cherry-pick cleanly. I've not looked at each of them yet and I would very much appreciate your advice about the best way to proceed.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16511
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16512
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16658
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16701
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16747
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16902
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16978
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe they should be cherry-picked in a specific order in order to avoid conflicts ? For instance, maybe one of the pending backports that you can see at
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Ajewel+label%3Arbd
>>>>>
>>>>> would avoid some of the conflicts if merged ? I'm thinking specifically
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646
>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10644
>>>>>
>>>>> What I'm looking for, ideally, is a way to order the cherry-picks to avoid any conflict. That may involve backporting a few additional pull requests (for instance when the type of an argument changes from int64_t to uint64_t, that creates a lot of potential conflicts and backporting that change could help, even if it is not required to fix a given bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are three backports that also do not apply because of a conflict but do not seem to be related to rbd-mirror. Unless you advise otherwise, I'll attempt to resolve these individually and assume there is complex interaction with other backports.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16904
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16735
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance for your guidance !
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre



-- 
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux