> On Jul 26, 2016, at 01:12, Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ceph creates multiple caches with the SLAB_RECLAIMABLE flag set, so > that it can satisfy its internal needs. Inspecting the code shows that > most of the caches are indeed reclaimable since they are directly > related to the generic inode/dentry shrinkers. However, one of the > cache used to satisfy struct file is not reclaimable since its > entries are freed only when the last reference to the file is > dropped. If a heavily loaded node opens a lot of files it can > introduce non-trivial discrepancies between memory shown as reclaimable > and what is actually reclaimed when drop_caches is used. > > Fix this by removing the reclaimable flag for the file's cache. > > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Fixed checkpatch warning + missing SOB line > > fs/ceph/super.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c > index 91e02481ce06..8697cac6add0 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/super.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c > @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ static int __init init_caches(void) > if (ceph_dentry_cachep == NULL) > goto bad_dentry; > > - ceph_file_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(ceph_file_info, > - SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD); > + ceph_file_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(ceph_file_info, SLAB_MEM_SPREAD); > + > if (ceph_file_cachep == NULL) > goto bad_file; > Applied, thanks Yan, Zheng > -- > 2.7.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
