Re: [ceph-users] un-even data filled on OSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello! 

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 07:38:10AM +0530, swamireddy wrote:

> Blair - Thanks for the details. I used to set the low priority for
> recovery during the rebalance/recovery activity.
> Even though I set the recovery_priority as 5 (instead of 1) and
> client-op_priority set as 63, some of my customers complained that
> their VMs are not reachable for a few mins/secs during the reblancing
> task. Not sure, these low priority configurations are doing the job as
> its.

It is true up to Hammer at least. I have no possibility to test it on jevel
setup due to my company policy (part of my cluster already is jevel, but I can
not continue upgrade due to direct directive).

> Thanks
> Swami

-- 
WBR, Max A. Krasilnikov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux