Re: [Ceph-qa] QE validation hammer v0.94.7 finished (needs approval)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-61
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing:
>
> rados (subset 1/7)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> hadoop
> samba
> rest
> ceph-deploy
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x (hammer)
> upgrade/firefly-x (hammer)
> upgrade/hammer
> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis)
> powercycle
>
> Known issues (approved for release):
>
> fs:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14716 - (same as in v0.94.6 was
> approved by Greg, Josh)
>
> samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14714 - (same as in v0.94.6 was approved by Greg)
>
> krbd:
> see failed runs, Jason/Josh pls review and approve or suggest next steps.

krbd based on

    http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/teuthology-2016-04-24_18:06:02-krbd-hammer-testing-basic-openstack/

looks OK to me - known xfstests failures, under-provisioned OSDs (97%
full) and a huge-tickets failure.

huge-tickets seems to be failing consistently on ovh, I'll investigate
later.

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux