Re: open the floodgates...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:03 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>> and release the (pull requests with code destined for) kraken!
>>
>> One question: we moved from a 'next' branch to 'jewel' branch for the
>> development period to represent the 'frozen' bugfix branch before each
>> development checkpoint release.  Should we
>>
>> 1) Use a 'kraken' branch, just like we did with jewel.  After each dev
>> release, merge in the next lump of new stuff from master.\
>
>
> I've become accustomed to this, so it seems natural to me. Subjectively, +1
>
>> 2) Go back to a 'next' branch, like we did pre-jewel.
>
>
> No, thanks.
>
>> 3) Give up on the delayed dev checkpoint release thing we've been doing
>> (where we send bug fixes to next or kraken for 2 weeks before release) and
>> just release regular checkpoints of master (as 11.0.z).
>
>
> Though this delay introduces some complexity, we have it documented and it
> serves a good purpose: i.e. making the dev checkpoint releases more stable.
>
>> 4) Stop doing development checkpoint releases entirely and let testers
>> pull automated builds from gitbuilder or jenkins.
>
>
> Psychologically, the "imprimatur" of a checkpoint release is reassuring.
> Perhaps more importantly, the granularity of point releases has information
> value. You ask someone what version they are running - with dev checkpoint
> releases they say "10.1.2". Without them, they would say
> "4a2a6f72640d6b74a3bbd92798bb913ed380dcd4".

What about a middle ground: keep the checkpoint releases but automated
like the gitbuilders: the releases would be incremental and
have a release cadence that could be nightly/weekly/every-other-day.

This would also play nicely with #3 were we could already be cutting
dev releases for 11.0.z

Keeping releases coming from the actual release-named branch (e.g.
'jewel') would help the current release process that bases the model
around that
idea (we have never cut a release from a 'next' or 'master' branch).

>
> --
> Nathan Cutler
> Software Engineer Distributed Storage
> SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.
> Tel.: +420 284 084 037
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux