Hi Loic, sorry for the late response, was out for a couple of weeks, and managed to miss this message. Yes, it looks fine. The valgrind issue does not look like rgw related. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ping ? > > On 11/04/2016 13:43, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14692#note-46). >> >> One failure is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15316 when seems related to how ansible installs Amazon::S3 >> The other is a valgrind issue which seems new http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-04-06_01:32:41-rgw-hammer-backports---basic-smithi/110829/ >> >> There are runs of the rgw hammer branch on http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/?branch=hammer&suite=rgw as well but they are tainted by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13885 which will hopefully be fixed by https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/pull/104 for the next round of jewel/hammer backports. >> >> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
