On 20-4-2016 10:47, Erwan Velu wrote: > I have the exact same trace while running a test on teuthology. And I guess you are not running FreeBSD... :) Teuthology would certainly not. Does you test also ends in error? --WjW > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Willem Jan Withagen" <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> > À: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Envoyé: Samedi 16 Avril 2016 13:07:10 > Objet: New messages in OSD logs. > > Hi > > I've recently rebased my fork, and also upgrae FreeBSD to more recent code. > Now I'm running into this: > > 2016-04-16 03:03:55.891466 805617000 -1 > filestore(testdir/test-erasure-eio/0) WARNING: max attr value size (1024) > is smaller than osd_max_object_name_len (2048). Your backend filesystem > appears to not support attrs large enough > to handle the configured max rados name size. You may get unexpected > ENAMETOOLONG errors on rados operations or buggy behavior > > and later on: > > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287073 805617000 2 osd.0 0 boot > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287846 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 backend (filestore) is > unable to support max object name[space] le > n > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287873 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 osd max object name > len = 2048 > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287894 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 osd max object > namespace len = 256 > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.287931 805617000 -1 osd.0 0 (63) File name too long > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.303432 805617000 1 journal close > testdir/test-erasure-eio/0/journal > 2016-04-16 03:04:03.310280 805617000 -1 ^[[0;31m ** ERROR: osd init > failed: (63) File name too long^[[0m > > And the OSD dies.... > > I guess that this has the do with the changes in the LFN modules, and is > also the reason for the debate about ext4 support. > > Uptill now unittest_chain_xattr did work, but that now also fails. > But it fails in a strange way where it tries to delete attributes with > numerical ends that are certainly not in the attributes. > Maximum xattr name length in FreeBSD seems to be 256 chars, which wasn't > a problem yet. > > So is there any chance of continuing on my "old" way to finish a first > version of the port? > > Or am I just seeing things, and should I start looking at the FreeBSD > side of things? > > > Thanx, > --WjW > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
