Re: Sessions and Persistence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gregory Farnum" <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "The Sacred Order of the Squid Cybernetic" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 6:38:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Sessions and Persistence
> 
...

> This is something I've suggested in the past, but I think it's at the
> stage where somebody needs to write code demonstrating it is something
> approaching performant. If it is, I don't think anybody opposes the
> idea;

That's reasonable.

 if it's not, then throughput/IOP regressions are not a tradeoff
> Sam/Sage are willing to make for this IIRC (and, though I am more
> optimistic than I remember them being about our odds of success, I
> suppose I'm not either).

There seems to be violent agreement about this.

Matt

> -Greg
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-707-0660
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux