Re: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed most of the fs suite (http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/teuthology-2016-04-10_17:00:02-fs-hammer---basic-openstack/) failed 2 and has 5 dead. There are no matching tests in on the sepia lab.
>
> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Or should the above errors be investigated first ?

I'm sorry I lost track of this.

That test breakdown seems typical to me given the current state of our
suite on ovh. If one wanted to check carefully, verifying that all the
dead jobs have crashed OSDs (on ENOSPC or EIO) would verify that.

Otherwise, it's probably appropriate to start QE testing on the sepia lab.
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux