On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:02 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06 2016, Sage Weil wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> Please pull the following Ceph patch from
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
>>
>> This is a final commit we missed to align the protocol compatibility with
>> the feature bits. It decodes a few extra fields in two different messages
>> and reports EIO when they are used (not yet supported).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> sage
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Yan, Zheng (1):
>> ceph: initial CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 support
>
> Just wondering, but was CEPH_FEATURE_FS_FILE_LAYOUT_V2 supposed to have
> exactly the same value as CEPH_FEATURE_NEW_OSDOPREPLY_ENCODING (and
> CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_TUNABLES5)??
Yes, that was the point of getting it merged into -rc7.
> Because when I backported this patch (and many others) to some ancient
> enterprise kernel, it caused mounts to fail. If it really is meant to
> be the same value, then I must have some other backported issue to find
> and fix.
It has to be backported in concert with changes that add support for
the other two bits. How did mount fail?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
