On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote: > > Hi Loïc, > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: > >> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote: > >>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian > >>> wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to drop support for an > >>> OS in the middle of a stable series. > >> > >> I'm unsure if wheezy is among the old OS'es. It predates my involvement in the stable releases effort. I know for sure el6 and 12.04 are supported for 0.94.x. > > > >>From http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/pool/main/c/ceph/ > > > > ceph-common_0.94.1-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 10217628 > > ceph-common_0.94.3-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 19-Oct-2015 18:54 9818964 > > ceph-common_0.94.4-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 26-Oct-2015 20:48 9868020 > > ceph-common_0.94.5-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 9868188 > > > > That's all debian wheezy. > > > > (Huh. I'd never noticed 0.94.1 was i386 only!) > > > > Indeed. Were these packages created as a lucky side effect or because > there was a commitment at some point ? I'm curious to know the answer as > well :-) Wheezy was part of the official supported list for hammer (and still should be). I think this was just an oversight for the last hammer release, unless there is some infrastructure issues I haven't heard about. There will be another hammer release before too long. sage
