Hi Robert, Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware of the new multimap interface. I have been happy with the tree-based interfaces, however. Matt ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert LeBlanc" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Matt Benjamin" <mbenjamin@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Abhishek Lekshmanan" <abhishek@xxxxxxxx>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 3:03:39 PM > Subject: Re: master build failure with boost 1.60 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > I was able to do what I needed to with avl_set/rbtree/avltree, just > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/intrusive/map_multimap.html > looks like it may provide a cleaner interface that would be closer to > the STL in C++. This was introduced in 1.59. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: Mailvelope v1.3.6 > Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com > > wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJW3d6RCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAXSAP/3gXRVAAuhVgoEmUnX6s > r+BrNqYoXZ5+lpXZbMNmZBfNeXKZSOeQW51Vjy4xHsYhi3nj29SDedwoc4Bq > DA+es5JN/8etfr3SZgyfA6DMnvsNpUT/OO1mSjpkiPsExG6lK4iVKf1Y/M9B > dXfHmeP3lVUMD08qgqzCgaYEoxQfI42tvF+PubcxfDp0OOq9/+SFD68YT+tL > PmA1BVjnCBtuPMmy4OzsbD7TFSdqr8rATUTW2TzkaxUMRN61oZnFqBwVjkj2 > ZfdFtuZj1/W1+ddHnVbM0xz3asM7kUJUblPMGBXH+jVTr2Jq9/ftqB/fh3hS > 45QGSjET6KJOPd3W3S2Kqbccpf2UZAThPFLz1+oNCls3Efn/3sBOsbQJNNBr > tSq3nJKa7oUqDF0Fs2hRQzEzYu5MnV9dN8dmW9eZSs3tbTtcWVQjfYve1NP1 > +udkXyPQtnc4YY5EvDi/Xn6Yoh6NHxkbw2hZa1WmEQEbTb3X4CBZHNKLXAxR > Yx1PW08UPQrdhxUwQ41khvcVlElx9DLPwGnMlZQzvF4wnuEPqBSFNCqB2Eeh > pEB81e5gnR2Qwx7oHywh2aZpTxf9ybUsQvaCBettqmSUB66N36V/3eGTfHQH > CDdMw02iBD6PpG/FNq6Nkyh7D5y8duz2zrN2rvD1gpMWcssFIhbcXzH1ba4S > VZhU > =FBbh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > ---------------- > Robert LeBlanc > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt Benjamin <mbenjamin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > What were you unable to do with Boost intrusive avl_set/rbtree/avltree in > > versions below 1.6? > > > > Matt > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Robert LeBlanc" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: "Abhishek Lekshmanan" <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 12:31:22 PM > >> Subject: Re: master build failure with boost 1.60 > >> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> If we use boost 1.60, we can use intrusive maps which would be a lot > >> easier in that code. I had to not use them to keep compatibility with > >> older versions. I'm surprised that it is broken in newer versions. > >> I'll see if I can figure out what is going wrong here. > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> Version: Mailvelope v1.3.6 > >> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com > >> > >> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJW3brlCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAUkEQAK29Zc6W3IgBung03c1T > >> md86mP1i6uBqyA4oFTmM4r4CF5dCQRrrAHXSd/1cM9bcvFmsir1LAjEalKaP > >> f8P+lOPbHE8InQBe1b/pcS9vC2CaK8QeceONJBaEzlqwMaGFsIIFvlUd38jf > >> 7Az/GlfRL+34LxAnShXQQJNTy8U7qqGp4ugRZSVPz9QaZDOayArfv3mlwzpD > >> rzmXDWeq4JqGhtKdwlWiGdB6EF7t9BdbFzYFCcUyJ5v9G3kTMQJ7ROnv4Zu2 > >> ZoPVKcQ0wnjwxQSZVLGnvw1sYHeO9vUItqaMDl3RjpQrjXx25FpNY/9NrInT > >> b14V/yEaDVyK1y85a2nLTwVVkRPq8GMXIJtvkCSV5sS2Zoo8Y85sX8SAL6qq > >> y/hn4Uq73T+CBGq3Gy6Key7VnvzGcq9EvVw+3UnMkaxdyZOAQy/ly0lYLjpF > >> SBw51h9ExPpl0pRACkkoa+64NeAlej3Zqk2c2EgB4+WGjuUhdSMxSmSmhLDw > >> +VYQhz/GMHB+M7AkNIW9Cgo/muCM5jbhkU6wbHB6fKvohpA23UwWXBsK6AU+ > >> xjWJw0PuSYwpUsKYoD/U4F0YUDM39CQC6qpP1iCeVeptiuKzg7JWi0jh7myN > >> mkuSjPo90ypaLa3kioX69Hr9BcCTTZ82wMjn44A5e3PV8Tvict2CYmCua57U > >> Stp2 > >> =DdLX > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >> ---------------- > >> Robert LeBlanc > >> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On 03/07/2016 03:49 PM, Karol Mroz wrote: > >> >> Hi folks, > >> >> > >> >> We've recently hit a build failure on ceph master for which Abhishek > >> >> has > >> >> opened > >> >> a bug: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14998. > >> >> > >> >> Our rolling distribution (openSUSE Tumbleweed) has pushed out boost > >> >> 1.60 > >> >> which looks to be at the heart of the failure. Is boost 1.60 to be > >> >> supported in > >> >> Jewel? > >> > > >> > Reverting https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7654 makes the build > >> > succeed, of course that is not the solution, but might indicate where we > >> > may need fixing > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > Abhishek > >> > > >> >> Thanks! > >> >> > >> > > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> > > > > -- > > Matt Benjamin > > Red Hat, Inc. > > 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A > > Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 > > > > http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage > > > > tel. 734-707-0660 > > fax. 734-769-8938 > > cel. 734-216-5309 > -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-707-0660 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
