Re: QE validation infernalis v9.2.1 status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 26/02/2016 02:21, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/02/2016 18:55, Alfredo Deza wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Alfredo & Yuri,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that the SHA for the infernalis release v9.2.1 is 71f380a81c6870466e11a74a597f847494ba23e9 as mentioned at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#Release-information. It is *not* the head of the infernalis branch which contains two additional commits. These two additional commits have been tested and approved by Yehuda but they have not been tested by QE.
>>>>
>>>> This is very very unfortunate as we already had built the packages
>>>> from the tip of infernalis.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What was the tip of infernalis when you built the packages ?
>>>
>>
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/71f380a81c6870466e11a74a597f847494ba23e9
>
> It is the good SHA1, all is well :-)

It is!

I somehow didn't connect that with the SHA you sent earlier. Will try
to get this out today.
>
>>
>>>> As it currently stands we don't have the ability to configure a build
>>>> from a distinct SHA commit.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know when this is ready to build from the tip of the branch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *   commit d148ed64e4b865baceeadbe999dcba2ca956d932
>>>>> |\  Merge: d9e3ffb 43f0305
>>>>> | | Author: Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | | Date:   Thu Feb 25 11:08:07 2016 +0700
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     Merge pull request #7423 from Abhishekvrshny/wip-14324-infernalis
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     infernalis: rgw: radosgw-admin bucket check --fix not work
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     Reviewed-by: Yehuda Sadeh <ysadehwe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | * commit 43f0305e596a51985fa06379ed6228e1c21aa445
>>>>> | | Author: Weijun Duan <duanweijun@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> | | Date:   Sun Jan 3 20:12:04 2016 -0500
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     rgw: radosgw-admin bucket check --fix not work
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     Fixed:#14215
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |     Signed-off-by: Weijun Duan <duanweijun@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> | |     (cherry picked from commit a17f4e27d608ef29cf499fe76246929ec7962783)
>>>>> | |
>>>>> * |   commit d9e3ffb2fe1061aa1035d507019216d76cd71664
>>>>> |\ \  Merge: 71f380a beb4b66
>>>>> | | | Author: Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | | | Date:   Thu Feb 25 11:07:44 2016 +0700
>>>>> | | |
>>>>> | | |     Merge pull request #7424 from Abhishekvrshny/wip-13887-infernalis
>>>>> | | |
>>>>> | | |     infernalis: rgw: orphans finish segfaults
>>>>> | | |
>>>>> | | |     Reviewed-by: Yehuda Sadeh <ysadehwe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | | |
>>>>> | * | commit beb4b66c2f2eb4a22e6213b4b87d1670c10e5227
>>>>> | |/  Author: Igor Fedotov <ifedotov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | |   Date:   Thu Nov 19 13:38:40 2015 +0300
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |       Fixing NULL pointer dereference
>>>>> | |
>>>>> | |       Signed-off-by: Igor Fedotov <ifedotov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> | |       (cherry picked from commit 93d3dfe0441be50a6990d458ee0ee3289af39b20)
>>>>> | |
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25/02/2016 04:41, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>>>>>> Alfredo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> QE validation for infernalis v9.2.1 is completed and it's ready for publishing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thx
>>>>>> YuriW
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13750#note-32
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following suites were in scope of this point release testing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rados (subset 1/7)
>>>>>>> rbd
>>>>>>> rgw
>>>>>>> fs
>>>>>>> krbd
>>>>>>> kcephfs
>>>>>>> knfs
>>>>>>> hadoop
>>>>>>> samba
>>>>>>> rest
>>>>>>> ceph-deploy
>>>>>>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>>>>>>> upgrade/hammer-x (infernalis)
>>>>>>> upgrade/firefly-x (infernalis)
>>>>>>> upgrade/firefly-hammer-x (infernalis)
>>>>>>> upgrade/infernalis
>>>>>>> powercycle
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Known issues (approved for release):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> krbd:
>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14848 - approved by Jason
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ceph-deploy:
>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14223 - assumed approved by Sage (?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> powercycle:
>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14810 - needs Sage approval
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thx
>>>>>>> YuriW
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux