> On Feb 10, 2016, at 19:22, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is not quite what I described and the whole function is still as > entangled as it was and very hard to validate. But, with the dynamic > array logic gone, I won't press it any further. > > The r_inline_ops being unused in the >CEPH_OSD_INITAL_OP case concern > still stands however. I pushed wip-alloc-request for that, could you > see if you can rebase "libceph: add helper that duplicates last extent > operation" and "ceph: scattered page writeback" on top of it? I pushed the rebased patches to sip-alloc-request branch. I also updated your patch, adding code to calculate r_request/r_reply messages sizes. Regards Yan, Zheng > > Thanks, > > Ilya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
