On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Nick Fisk wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > Jason Dillaman > > Sent: 27 January 2016 14:25 > > To: Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Possible Cache Tier Bug - Can someone confirm > > > > Are you running with an EC pool behind the cache tier? I know there was an > > issue with the first Infernalis release where unsupported ops were being > > proxied down to the EC pool, resulting in that same error. > > Hi Jason, yes I am. 3x Replicated pool on top of an EC pool. > > It's probably something similar to what you mention. Either the client > should be able to access the RBD header object on the base pool, or it > should be flagged so that it can't be evicted. I just confirmed that the rbd_id.$name object doesn't have any omap, so from rados's perspective, flushing and evicting it is fine. But yeah, the cls_rbd ops aren't permitted in the EC pool. In master/jewel we have a cache-pin function that prevents an object from being flushed. A few options are: 1) Have cls_rbd cache-pin it's objects. 2) Have cls_rbd put an omap key on the object to indirectly do the same. 3) Add a requires-cls type object flag that keeps hte object out of an EC pool *until* it eventually supports cls ops. I'd lean toward 1 since it's simple and explicit, and when we eventually make classes work we can remove the cache-pin behavior from cls_rbd. It's harder to fix in infernalis unless we also backport cache-pin/unpin ops, too, so maybe #2 would be a simple infernalis workaround? Jason? Sam? sage > > > > > -- > > > > Jason Dillaman > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nick Fisk" <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 8:46:53 AM > > > Subject: [ceph-users] Possible Cache Tier Bug - Can someone confirm > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I think I have stumbled on a bug. I'm running Infernalis (Kernel 4.4 > > > on the > > > client) and it seems that if the RBD header object gets evicted from > > > the cache pool then you can no longer map it. > > > > > > Steps to reproduce > > > > > > rbd -p cache1 create Test --size=10G > > > rbd - p cache1 map Test > > > > > > /dev/rbd1 <-Works!! > > > > > > rbd unmap /dev/rbd1 > > > > > > rados -p cache1 cache-flush rbd_id.Test rados -p cache1 cache-evict > > > rbd_id.Test rbd - p cache1 map Test > > > > > > rbd: sysfs write failed > > > rbd: map failed: (95) Operation not supported > > > > > > or with the rbd-nbd client > > > > > > 2016-01-27 13:39:52.686770 7f9e54162b00 -1 asok(0x561837b88360) > > > AdminSocketConfigObs::init: failed: AdminSocket::bind_and_listen: > > > failed to bind the UNIX domain socket to > > > '/var/run/ceph/ceph-client.admin.asok': (17) File exists > > > 2016-01-27 13:39:52.703987 7f9e32ffd700 -1 librbd::image::OpenRequest: > > > failed to retrieve image id: (95) Operation not supported > > > rbd-nbd: failed to map, status: (95) Operation not supported > > > 2016-01-27 13:39:52.704138 7f9e327fc700 -1 librbd::ImageState: failed > > > to open image: (95) Operation not supported > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list > > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
