Re: reducing buffer allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is the approach that Casey and I lean toward, but if the intrusive ptr change is ready now, I'd work on merging it.

Matt

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allen Samuels" <Allen.Samuels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Sage Weil" <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 5:43:36 PM
> Subject: RE: reducing buffer allocations
> 
> Looks like another place for small_vector ;-)
> 
> 
> Allen Samuels
> Software Architect, Fellow, Systems and Software Solutions
> 
> 2880 Junction Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134
> T: +1 408 801 7030| M: +1 408 780 6416
> allen.samuels@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:33 PM
> To: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: reducing buffer allocations
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5534
> 
> does two things: (1) combine the buffer::raw reference count and buffer into
> a single allocation (ala make_shared), and (2) convert buffer::list into an
> intrusive_list, while embedding N (=3) buffer::ptr's in the buffer::raw so
> that most buffers require only 1 allocation (provided they aren't on more
> than N lists).
> 
> This needs a rebase, and some benchmarking.  But before I pull it up, is this
> the right direction?  I saw little benefit from (2) after doing (1), but I
> was doing a really simple microbenchmark.  Do we want both, or just 1, or is
> there an alternative we should consider?
> 
> sage
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is
> intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that you have received this message in error and that any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy
> any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies
> or electronically stored copies).
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
-- 
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-707-0660
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux