Hi Cephers, I am going through OSD Code flow. I noticed that the work queue for normal read write operations is Prioritized Queue (op_shardedwq in OSD.h), whereas the recovery work queue is FIFO with respect to PGs . The PG which was first discovered to be "need to be recovered" will be recovered first. There might be a PG which has more recovery work to do , but was last in the queue. So in that case, it will lead to a higher recovery time. I think it is FIFO assuming that the PG which needs more recovery , must have lost many OSDs and should be well ahead in the queue. Should we have a recovery queue implemented as priority queue for the PGs ? Please let me know whether I am right or there is some problem in my understanding. -- Gaurav Bafna 9540631400 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
