Re: inconsistent rados semantics between automake/cmake builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's easy for me to reproduce. What would you like me to run?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Adam C. Emerson <aemerson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21/01/2016, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
> [snip]
>> This sounds somewhat like an issue Casey and Orit had seen, one that I
>> wasn't able to replicate (both of them are using cmake, I'm using
>> automake). I think they tracked it to Adam's c++11 time change.
> [snip]
>
> I was thinking about this the other night. There doesn't seem to be any problem
> with the actual /read/ that I can find. (There'd be failures in stat all over
> the place.)
>
> But I recalled that Objecter allows you to specify the mtime for operations and
> thought perhaps that might be where the problem is. If we know what operation is
> creating/last touching these objects, can someone who's able to reproduce the
> problem run a cycle or two of it through valgrind? It might be feeding in a
> not-properly-initialized time value, and if this shows up under one build system
> but not another that feels like it could be a touch more likely.
>
> --
> Senior Software Engineer           Red Hat Storage, Ann Arbor, MI, US
> IRC: Aemerson@{RedHat, OFTC, Freenode}
> 0x80F7544B90EDBFB9 E707 86BA 0C1B 62CC 152C  7C12 80F7 544B 90ED BFB9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux