Re: Issue with Ceph File System and LIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Eric Eastman
<eric.eastman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I patched the 4.4rc4 kernel source and restarted the test.  Shortly
> after starting it, this showed up in dmesg:
>
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2547 at
> fs/ceph/addr.c:1162 ceph_write_begin+0xfb/0x120 [ceph]()
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] Modules linked in: iscsi_target_mod
> vhost_scsi tcm_qla2xxx ib_srpt tcm_fc tcm_usb_gadget tcm_loop
> target_core_file target_core_iblock target_core_pscsi target_core_user
> target_core_mod ipmi_devintf vhost qla2xxx ib_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core
> ib_addr libfc scsi_transport_fc libcomposite udc_core uio configfs ttm
> ipmi_ssif drm_kms_helper drm coretemp kvm gpio_ich i2c_algo_bit
> i7core_edac fb_sys_fops syscopyarea edac_core sysfillrect sysimgblt
> ipmi_si input_leds hpilo ipmi_msghandler shpchp acpi_power_meter
> irqbypass serio_raw 8250_fintek lpc_ich mac_hid ceph bonding libceph
> lp parport libcrc32c fscache mlx4_en vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel
> ptp pps_core hid_generic usbhid hid mlx4_core hpsa psmouse bnx2 fjes
> scsi_transport_sas [last unloaded: target_core_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] CPU: 0 PID: 2547 Comm: iscsi_trx Tainted: G
>        W I     4.4.0-rc4-ede1 #1
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 G6, BIOS
> P64 01/22/2015
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  ffffffffc020cd47 ffff8805f1e97958
> ffffffff813ad644 0000000000000000
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  ffff8805f1e97990 ffffffff81079702
> ffff8805f1e97a50 00000000015dd000
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  ffff880c034df800 0000000000000200
> ffffea0000b26a80 ffff8805f1e979a0
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] Call Trace:
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff813ad644>] dump_stack+0x44/0x60
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff81079702>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xc0
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff810797fa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc01e53bb>]
> ceph_write_begin+0xfb/0x120 [ceph]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff8117c8df>]
> generic_perform_write+0xbf/0x1a0
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc01dff9c>]
> ceph_write_iter+0xf5c/0x1010 [ceph]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff810a888c>] ? __enqueue_entity+0x6c/0x70
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff813c0003>] ?
> iov_iter_get_pages+0x113/0x210
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff816b6802>] ?
> skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x122/0x250
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff811f6c93>] vfs_iter_write+0x63/0xa0
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc03c3f29>]
> fd_do_rw.isra.5+0xc9/0x1b0 [target_core_file]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc03c40d5>]
> fd_execute_rw+0xc5/0x2a0 [target_core_file]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc0445e72>]
> sbc_execute_rw+0x22/0x30 [target_core_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc04449cf>]
> __target_execute_cmd+0x1f/0x70 [target_core_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc0445525>]
> target_execute_cmd+0x195/0x2a0 [target_core_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc05c978a>]
> iscsit_execute_cmd+0x20a/0x270 [iscsi_target_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc05d28da>]
> iscsit_sequence_cmd+0xda/0x190 [iscsi_target_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc05d8c4d>]
> iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x51d/0xe30 [iscsi_target_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff8101463d>] ? __switch_to+0x1cd/0x570
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffffc05d8730>] ?
> iscsi_target_tx_thread+0x1c0/0x1c0 [iscsi_target_mod]
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff810974c9>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff81097400>] ?
> kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff817c794f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015]  [<ffffffff81097400>] ?
> kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
> [Thu Dec 17 03:29:55 2015] ---[ end trace 382a45986961da4e ]---


Could you please try the apply the new incremental patch and try again.


Regards
Yan, Zheng


>
> There are WARNINGs on both line 125 and 1162. I will attached the
> whole set of dmesg output to the tracker ticket 14086
>
> I wanted to note that file system snapshots are enabled and being used
> on this file system.
>
> Thanks
> Eric
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Eric Eastman
> <eric.eastman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>> This warning is really strange. Could you try the attached debug patch.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Yan, Zheng
>>
>> I will try the patch and get back to the list.
>>
>> Eric

Attachment: cephfs1.patch
Description: Binary data


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux