RE: Scaling Ceph reviews and testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:32 AM
>
> Even seasoned contributors struggle to understand the logic behind
> teuthology. Knowing for certain that a given job is known to pass with
> OpenStack is a major enabler. When a job is supposed to pass with
> OpenStack but has never been actually verified, it quickly becomes a blocker
> because the contributor can hardly differentiate that from a bug in his pull
> request. For instance, today Piotr Dalek had to patiently run a rados/thrash
> job four times to sort out if the machine crashing came from his pull request
> or from a lack of memory (8GB by default).

Turned out to be resource issue. Seeing how random it is, I assume 8GB is on a brink of being enough - maybe increasing it to 12 (twelve) GB would do the trick without requiring too much resources?

With best regards / Pozdrawiam
Piotr Dałek

��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux