On 29-10-15 10:19, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Hi Ceph: > > The civetweb code in RGW is taken from https://github.com/ceph/civetweb/ > which is a fork of https://github.com/civetweb/civetweb. The last commit > to our fork took place on March 18. > > Upstream civetweb development has progressed ("This branch is 19 commits > ahead, 972 commits behind civetweb:master.") > > Are there plans to rebase to a newer upstream version or should we think > more in terms of backporting (to ceph/civetweb.git) from upstream > (civetweb/civetweb.git) when we need to fix bugs or add features? > I think it would be smart to keep tracking civetweb from upstream otherwise we forked Civetweb. We might run into some issues with Civetweb which we need to fix upstream, that's a lot easier if we are close to where upstream is. Wido > Thanks and regards > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
