On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, changtao381 wrote: > Hi, > > I?m testing the deep-scrub function of ceph. And the test steps are below : > > 1) I put an object on ceph using command : > rados put test.txt test.txt ?p testpool > > The size of testpool is 3, so there three replicates on three osds: > > osd.0: /data1/ceph_data/osd.0/current/1.0_head/test.txt__head_8B0B6108__1 > osd.1: /data2/ceph_data/osd.1/current/1.0_head/test.txt__head_8B0B6108__1 > osd.2 /data3/ceph_data/osd.2/current/1.0_head/test.txt__head_8B0B6108__1 > > 2) I modified the content of one replica on osd.0 using vim editor directly on disk > > 3) I run the command > ?ceph pg deep-scrub 1.0 > > and expect it can check the inconsistent error out, but it fails. It doesn?t find the error > why? Becuse you *just* wrote the object, and the FileStore caches open file handles. Vim renames a new inode over the old one so the open inode is untouched. If you restart the osd and then scrub you'll see the error. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
