On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 02:03 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 00:45:18 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > Apologies for the delayed follow-up on your original patch. > > No problem - thanks for the feedback! > > > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 13:00 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote: > > > For active/active clustered iSCSI targets (e.g. LIO + Ceph RBD), > > > SendTargets responses from any single node should include portal details > > > for remote cluster nodes. > > > > > > This patch-set adds a TPG discoverable_while_disabled attribute, which > > > when set sees LIO include details for a disabled TPG in SendTargets > > > responses. > > > > > > This allows for the use of a common configuration for cluster nodes, > > > with TPGT/enable set on a node specific basis. > > > > > > A patch-set to ensure that LIO doesn't listen/accept connections via > > > disabled TPGs will follow once I've finished cleaning it up. > > > > > > Feedback appreciated. > > > > No objections to adding an attribute to allow disabled TPGs to be > > included in sendtargets discovery information, but I think this > > particular configfs attribute can use a better name.. > > Heh, yeah I also wasn't a fan of discoverable_while_disabled, but > couldn't think of anything better. > > > How about the following instead..? > > Looks like an improvement to me. > Applied to target-pending/for-next with your original authorship + signed-off-by for the patch. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
