Hi, Sorry Nathan, I went AFK before answering: <smithfarm_nb> one more question: why did you change the tracker from Bug to Backport on http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11542 ? <smithfarm_nb> I'm guessing it was because there was only one backport target (firefly) <smithfarm_nb> it seems to me that, according to http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO_schedule_an_issue_for_backporting you should have copied the issue from Bug to Backport tracker <smithfarm_nb> but if there is only one backport target this shortcut makes sense We did not write anything related to this and maybe we should. In theory, for unification purposes, I should have created an issue, link it to the master PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1768 and created an issue for the backport. It's overkill for just one commit, but ... that happens very rarely (maybe once a month ?). Therefore I think we can tolerate the overkill administrative overhead. I shouldn't have tried to be creative. Here is the missing issue : http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12467 Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
