Hi Nathan, Which of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Ahammer+ceph.spec.in+in%3Atitle should be built in the gitbuilders first ? Cheers On 16/07/2015 01:28, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Abhishek, > > The last pull request from the previous integration branch was merged ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4891 ). > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#teuthology-run-commit-0c435d3974c9aa215ea10c6e9eed30ada6dbc390-hammer-backports-July-15 > > The ceph.spec.in pull request are not included (I made it so all of them have ceph.spec.in in the pull request title) because they conflict and the suite use debian packages. > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Ahammer+ceph.spec.in+in%3Atitle > > I believe running them one by one through the gitbuilders is the best we can do right now. > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
