Re: xattrs vs. omap with radosgw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With hammer the size of object_info_t crossed the 255 byte boundary, which 
> is the max xattr value that XFS can inline.  We've since merged something 
> that stripes over several small xattrs so that we can keep things inline, 
> but it hasn't been backported to hammer yet.  See
> c6cdb4081e366f471b372102905a1192910ab2da.

Meanwhile, Swift stopped striping altogether:
 https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/cc2f0f4ed6f12554b7d8e8cb61e14f2b103445a0

(but yes, it's still advantageous to fit into an inode)

-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux