[adding ceph-devel for other backporters benefit] Hi Nathan, On 15/06/2015 11:34, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Hi Loic: > > I went over the list of old untriaged backports at > > http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f[]=status_id&op[status_id]=%3D&v[status_id][]=14&f[]=cf_2&op[cf_2]=!*&f[]=&c[]=project&c[]=tracker&c[]=status&c[]=priority&c[]=subject&c[]=assigned_to&c[]=updated_on&c[]=category&c[]=fixed_version&c[]=cf_3&group_by= > > and processed those that I could figure out. There are four remaining > issues there - can you take a look? > I triaged three of them. The fourth was about krbd which has an entirely different lifecycle. I think we can assume the meaning of "Pending Backport" for the project http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-kclient is different from what we have at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases. I've updated http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO_triage_incoming_Pending_backport_issues with the following request instead of collecting all "Pending Backport" issues from all projects regardless. http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f[]=status_id&op[status_id]=%3D&v[status_id][]=14&f[]=cf_2&op[cf_2]=!*&f[]=subproject_id&op[subproject_id]=%3D&v[subproject_id][]=8&v[subproject_id][]=13&v[subproject_id][]=9&v[subproject_id][]=10&v[subproject_id][]=14&f[]=&c[]=project&c[]=tracker&c[]=status&c[]=priority&c[]=subject&c[]=assigned_to&c[]=updated_on&c[]=category&c[]=fixed_version&c[]=cf_3&group_by= Do you see an problem with that ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
