RE: Looking to improve small I/O performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Haomai Wang
> 
> > This is so because you use SimpleMessenger, which can't handle small I/O
> well.
> > Indeed, threads are problematic with it, as well as memory allocation.
> > I did some benchmarking some time ago and the gist of it is that you
> > could try going for AsyncMessenger and see if it helps. You can also see my
> results here:
> > http://stuff.predictor.org.pl/chunksize.xlsx
> > From there you can see that most of the time of small I/Os in
> > SimpleMessenger Is spent in tcmalloc code, and also there's a
> > performance drop around 64k Blocksize in Async Messenger.
> >
> 
> Thanks for your benchmark, I submit new performance enhanced patchset
> for AsyncMessenger. It should solve original stress test performance
> degraded problem :-)

Thanks! I'll check it out next week and hopefully got some results to share
on Wednesday.

With best regards / Pozdrawiam
Piotr Dałek
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux