Hi Yuri, If I'm not mistaken http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11660 is the last issue blocking v0.94.2. Is there another one I don't see ? Cheers On 26/05/2015 18:13, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic > > This hammer release QE validation is taking unusually long time and has issues that has to be clarified. > > All test results were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 > > There are several reasons contributing to slowness of this validation, product related as well as infrastructure related, also high amount of tests make turn around time slower as well. > > I think some suites, e.g. rados and upgrades for example will have to be re-run after issues had been clarified/fixed. > > rados, krbd, knfs, samba suite test results need reviews by the team leads. > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Abhishek L" <abhishek.lekshmanan@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE > > Hi Yuri, > > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 > > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 > > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#QE-Validation > > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on rgw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. > > The other two issues listed as blockers are > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to hammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
