Yes issues are specific to hammer. They are found in parts of rados suite, I am wondering if since we increased the amount of tests in it we ever saw them passed. Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Abhishek L" <abhishek.lekshmanan@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:33:32 AM Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Hi, On 18/05/2015 17:23, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic > > Thanks for the update. > > There were some issues logged over weekend that were not noted in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11661 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11660 Are they specific to hammer ? > environment related: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11546 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11659 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11662 > > Also, I see rgw latest run with 27 failures http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-05-12_17:42:50-rgw-hammer-distro-basic-multi/ All of which because of environmental problems: Failed to fetch package version from http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-deb-precise-x86_64-notcmalloc/sha1/b69fb89122d6f989152a29124cc7ed54b5e4d43b/version Cheers > > I will continue QE validation meanwhile. > > Thx > YuriW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Yuri Weinstein" <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Abhishek L" <abhishek.lekshmanan@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE > > Hi Yuri, > > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 > > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 > > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#QE-Validation > > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on rgw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. > > The other two issues listed as blockers are > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to hammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
