On 05/05/2015 12:49 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you explain why you want to hook into the lun reset code? I know > the PR code needs to issue implicit task aborts, but I don't > understand the need to do something with lun resets. I thought if you exported a LU through multiple LIO nodes and its ALUA state was active optimized/non-optimized on those nodes, then you would have to do similar cleanup across the cluster. For example, don't we have to fail commands on those other nodes, and then also depending on the TAS bit value return task aborted statuses? > As for the API: I would much prefer to have things at the block layer > in some form than adding side band protocol for specific functionality. > Ok. For what you need for your NFS cluster work, will you have a request_queue or block_device or gendisk? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
