>>Still not, we currently only focus on bug fix and stable purpose. Great (I have had some hang/crash client with benchmarking it) >>But I think performance improvement will be pick up soon(May?), the >>problem is clearly I think. Ok, I'll be happy to test it. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Haomai Wang" <haomaiwang@xxxxxxxxx> À: "aderumier" <aderumier@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Avril 2015 08:21:36 Objet: Re: async messenger small benchmark result Still not, we currently only focus on bug fix and stable purpose. But I think performance improvement will be pick up soon(May?), the problem is clearly I think. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>Thanks! So far we've gotten a report that asyncmesseneger was a little >>>slower than simple messenger, but not this bad! I imagine Greg will >>>have lots of questions. :) > > Note that this is with hammer, so maybe some improvements are already done is master ? > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> > À: "aderumier" <aderumier@xxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Envoyé: Mardi 28 Avril 2015 15:48:51 > Objet: Re: async messenger small benchmark result > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks! So far we've gotten a report that asyncmesseneger was a little > slower than simple messenger, but not this bad! I imagine Greg will > have lots of questions. :) > > Mark > > On 04/28/2015 03:36 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here a small bench 4k randread of simple messenger vs async messenger >> >> This is with 2 osd, and 15 fio jobs on a single rbd volume >> >> simple messager : 345kiops >> async messenger : 139kiops >> >> Regards, >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> >> >> simple messenger >> --------------- >> >> ^Cbs: 15 (f=15): [r(15)] [0.0% done] [1346MB/0KB/0KB /s] [345K/0/0 iops] [eta 59d:13h:32m:43s] >> fio: terminating on signal 2 >> >> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=15): err= 0: pid=44713: Tue Apr 28 10:26:21 2015 >> read : io=15794MB, bw=1321.4MB/s, iops=338255, runt= 11953msec >> slat (usec): min=5, max=17316, avg=33.81, stdev=63.77 >> clat (usec): min=4, max=60848, avg=1011.22, stdev=1026.16 >> lat (usec): min=110, max=60857, avg=1045.03, stdev=1031.56 >> clat percentiles (usec): >> | 1.00th=[ 219], 5.00th=[ 298], 10.00th=[ 362], 20.00th=[ 466], >> | 30.00th=[ 572], 40.00th=[ 676], 50.00th=[ 796], 60.00th=[ 940], >> | 70.00th=[ 1112], 80.00th=[ 1336], 90.00th=[ 1784], 95.00th=[ 2288], >> | 99.00th=[ 4128], 99.50th=[ 5536], 99.90th=[13376], 99.95th=[17536], >> | 99.99th=[28544] >> bw (KB /s): min=31386, max=122224, per=6.67%, avg=90244.35, stdev=17571.24 >> lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=2.21% >> lat (usec) : 500=21.02%, 750=22.82%, 1000=17.99% >> lat (msec) : 2=28.62%, 4=6.26%, 10=0.88%, 20=0.15%, 50=0.03% >> lat (msec) : 100=0.01% >> cpu : usr=36.30%, sys=10.85%, ctx=2323657, majf=0, minf=5736 >> IO depths : 1=0.2%, 2=0.8%, 4=3.4%, 8=16.3%, 16=72.0%, 32=7.3%, >=64=0.0% >> submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% >> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=94.8%, 8=1.0%, 16=1.5%, 32=2.6%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% >> issued : total=r=4043164/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0 >> latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32 >> >> Run status group 0 (all jobs): >> READ: io=15794MB, aggrb=1321.4MB/s, minb=1321.4MB/s, maxb=1321.4MB/s, mint=11953msec, maxt=11953msec >> >> >> async messenger (ms_async_op_threads=10) >> ----------------------------------------- >> ^Cbs: 15 (f=15): [r(15)] [0.0% done] [544.6MB/0KB/0KB /s] [139K/0/0 iops] [eta 301d:09h:10m:03s] >> fio: terminating on signal 2 >> >> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=15): err= 0: pid=42935: Tue Apr 28 10:24:29 2015 >> read : io=6389.8MB, bw=547856KB/s, iops=136963, runt= 11943msec >> slat (usec): min=7, max=23454, avg=39.33, stdev=226.05 >> clat (usec): min=58, max=107304, avg=3002.03, stdev=6270.44 >> lat (usec): min=91, max=107327, avg=3041.36, stdev=6279.32 >> clat percentiles (usec): >> | 1.00th=[ 129], 5.00th=[ 177], 10.00th=[ 229], 20.00th=[ 334], >> | 30.00th=[ 446], 40.00th=[ 564], 50.00th=[ 692], 60.00th=[ 836], >> | 70.00th=[ 1032], 80.00th=[ 1576], 90.00th=[10816], 95.00th=[17792], >> | 99.00th=[29824], 99.50th=[34048], 99.90th=[42240], 99.95th=[45824], >> | 99.99th=[50432] >> bw (KB /s): min=13359, max=128824, per=6.67%, avg=36544.92, stdev=37000.58 >> lat (usec) : 100=0.04%, 250=12.05%, 500=22.51%, 750=19.70%, 1000=14.66% >> lat (msec) : 2=12.32%, 4=2.66%, 10=5.34%, 20=6.81%, 50=3.91% >> lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01% >> cpu : usr=19.03%, sys=6.33%, ctx=370760, majf=0, minf=11335 >> IO depths : 1=0.4%, 2=0.9%, 4=5.3%, 8=20.2%, 16=66.0%, 32=7.3%, >=64=0.0% >> submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% >> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=95.5%, 8=0.9%, 16=0.9%, 32=2.8%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% >> issued : total=r=1635761/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0 >> latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32 >> >> Run status group 0 (all jobs): >> READ: io=6389.8MB, aggrb=547855KB/s, minb=547855KB/s, maxb=547855KB/s, mint=11943msec, maxt=11943msec >> >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Best Regards, Wheat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
