On 04/26/2015 11:35 PM, Douglas Fuller wrote:
This solution just feels hacky and inefficient, so I think there is a desire to feel like we at least tried to come up something simpler and more efficient before proceeding.
Right. And somehow more fitting with the existing code, if that's possible. There are a few things in this proposal that are just special case code, and it would be nice to avoid that. I'm sorry I've been too busy today to get back to this. I spent a lot of time on Saturday getting ramped back up on this code so I could provide a decent review... I'm going to at least look at the code (error on a read op) before going to bed, so I at least know what the problem is. I'll try to have something to say (even if it's "I've got nothing") in the next day or two. -Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html