----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 8:55:42 AM > Subject: Re: rgw and the next firefly release > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Yehuda Sadeh" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 2:44:07 AM > > Subject: rgw and the next firefly release > > > > Hi Yehuda, > > > > The rados teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back green > > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-27_18:04:18-rgw-firefly-backports---basic-multi/. > > Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? > > > > Cheers > > I think the following issues need to get in: > - 10978 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commit: > b6e43e30b39aed701bb4cdfaa0f6b27c1f207d86) it's actually eb13f2d4b60c031f16139f7cc4237c012644dd78. Sent pull request #3843. > - 10965 (fix still hasn't made it upstream, current commits: > f28fe744285117a1715eac0d08911cdb37285103, > caa90225bad9fe5e9c275e6189b3396b4d396e3f) > - 10907 (commit: 986d7554426764a149621ba733c5c075b94e0431) > > > I prepared the top two branches, need to do a sanity check on them first, > then I'll send a pull request to master. I think 10978 is critical, the > bottom two are important for civetweb and less risky. > > Yehuda > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
