Re: CephFS and the next firefly release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 01/03/2015 06:00, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> The fs teuthology suite for the next firefly release as found in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/firefly-backports came back with three failures : http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10641#fs. Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> P.S. I'll include the fs suite as part of the pre-QE round of testing from now on, unless you think it is redundant or not useful.
>>
>> It'd be nice to see those tests run on a new enough kernel that they
>> pass,
>
> Is there an open issue for this or should I create one ?

Not to do it automatically, no. That's made difficult since it just
runs as part of the generic workunits (which otherwise don't need a
kernel of any particular kind) and we actually want to run across a
variety of kernels to detect other bugs.
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux