Sage, we use apache as a filter for security and additional functionality reasons. I do like the idea, but we'd need some kind of interface to filter/modify/process requests. Best regards Axel Dunkel -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Sage Weil Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015 20:32 An: ceph-users@xxxxxxxx; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: who is using radosgw with civetweb? Hey, We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone rgw web server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead of the current apache + mod-fastcgi or mod-proxy-fcgi approach. "Supported" here means both the primary platform the upstream development focuses on and what the downstream Red Hat product will officially support. How many people are using RGW standalone using the embedded civetweb server instead of apache? In production? At what scale? What version(s) (civetweb first appeared in firefly and we've backported most fixes). Have you seen any problems? Any other feedback? The hope is to (vastly) simplify deployment. Thanks! sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
